Linnik’s constant

Description of constant

For integers $q\ge 2$ and $a$ with $\gcd(a,q)=1$, let $P(a,q)$ denote the least prime in the arithmetic progression $a \bmod q$. [Xyl2011-def-Paq]

Linnik’s theorem asserts that there exist constants $C,L>0$ such that

\[P(a,q)\ \le\ C\,q^{L} \qquad (\gcd(a,q)=1),\]

uniformly for all $q\ge 2$. [Xyl2011-def-Linnik]

We define

\[C_{65}\ :=\ L_{\mathrm{Lin}},\]

where $L_{\mathrm{Lin}}$ is the infimum of all exponents $L$ for which such a bound holds (with some constant $C$ independent of $a,q$). [Xyl2011-def-Linnik]

The previously recorded upper bound, due to Xylouris and reported in [MMT2024], is

\[L_{\mathrm{Lin}}\ \le\ 5.\]

[MMT2024-ub-5]

Naslund’s October 2026 computer-assisted preprint reports an improvement to $L_{\mathrm{Lin}}\le 3.99$ [Nas2026].

The bound $L_{\mathrm{Lin}}\le 2.4$ follows as a corollary of OpenAI’s $7/8$ quasi-Riemann hypothesis for Dirichlet $L$-functions [OAI2026], combined with classical zero-density estimates [IK2004].

A trivial lower bound is $L_{\mathrm{Lin}}\ge 1$, since for $a=1$ the first candidate prime is at least $q+1$.

Known upper bounds

Bound Reference Comments
$10000$ [Xyl2011] Historical table entry (Pan 1957). [Xyl2011-historical-table]
$5448$ [Xyl2011] Historical table entry (Pan 1958). [Xyl2011-historical-table]
$777$ [Xyl2011] Historical table entry (Chen 1965). [Xyl2011-historical-table]
$630$ [Xyl2011] Historical table entry (Jutila 1971). [Xyl2011-historical-table]
$550$ [Xyl2011] Historical table entry (Jutila 1970). [Xyl2011-historical-table]
$350$ [MMT2024] New $L$-function-free proof of Linnik’s problem (coarse exponent). [MMT2024-ub-350]
$168$ [Xyl2011] Historical table entry (Chen 1977). [Xyl2011-historical-table]
$80$ [Xyl2011] Historical table entry (Jutila 1977). [Xyl2011-historical-table]
$36$ [Xyl2011] Historical table entry (Graham 1977). [Xyl2011-historical-table]
$20$ [Xyl2011] Historical table entry (Graham 1981). [Xyl2011-historical-table]
$17$ [Xyl2011] Historical table entry (Chen 1979). [Xyl2011-historical-table]
$16$ [Xyl2011] Historical table entry (Wang 1986). [Xyl2011-historical-table]
$13.5$ [Xyl2011] Historical table entry (Chen-Liu 1989). [Xyl2011-historical-table]
$11.5$ [Xyl2011] Historical table entry (Chen-Liu 1991). [Xyl2011-historical-table]
$8$ [Xyl2011] Historical table entry (Wang 1991). [Xyl2011-historical-table]
$5.5$ [Xyl2011] Historical table entry (Heath-Brown 1992). [Xyl2011-historical-table]
$5.18$ [Xyl2011] Published explicit effective exponent in Theorem 1.1. [Xyl2011-ub-5-18]
$5$ [XylDiss2011] Attributed in modern literature to Xylouris’s 2011 dissertation. [MMT2024-ub-5]
$2.4$* [OAI2026], [IK2004] Deduced from the $7/8$ quasi-Riemann hypothesis for Dirichlet $L$-functions ([OAI2026], Theorem 1.1) together with the classical $12/5$ zero-density estimate ([IK2004], Theorem 10.4). The deduction is the contributing author’s, not the source’s: [OAI2026] does not state a Linnik bound, and the step combining it with the zero-density estimate has not been refereed or formalized. [OAI2026] is itself an unrefereed preprint.
$3.99$* [Nas2026], [NasRepo2026] Naslund (2 October 2026), Theorem 1.1. Uses a weighted near-density estimate and exact LP certificates for 4,788 terminal cases on 4,196,879 threshold boxes. Certificates and verification code at commit 0400629.

Known lower bounds

Bound Reference Comments
$1$   Trivial: $P(1,q)\ge q+1$.

References

Contribution notes

Prepared with assistance from ChatGPT 5.2 Pro.

The October 2026 update was prepared with assistance from Claude Opus 5.5 and revised with OpenAI Codex.