- Boxes
- definitions
- Ellipses
- theorems and lemmas
- Blue border
- the statement of this result is ready to be formalized; all prerequisites are done
- Orange border
- the statement of this result is not ready to be formalized; the blueprint needs more work
- Blue background
- the proof of this result is ready to be formalized; all prerequisites are done
- Green border
- the statement of this result is formalized
- Green background
- the proof of this result is formalized
- Dark green background
- the proof of this result and all its ancestors are formalized
There exists a magma that obeys Equation 1437,
but does not obey equation 4269,
For finite magmas, Equation 1441,
implies Equation 4067,
and equation 1443,
implies Equation 3055,
Definition 2.30 does not imply any of the following laws:
Equation 3457:
.Equation 2087:
.Equation 2124:
.Equation 3511:
.
There exists a 1516 magma with carrier
(i)
for all .(ii) For any distinct
, the equation has at least four solutions .(iii) For each
, there exist at least two such that .
Let
Let
A 1516 seed is a finite collection
Axiom 1:
.Axiom 2: If
and , then .Axiom 3: If
, then .Axiom 4: If
, then .Axiom 5: If
with , then .
An extension of a 1516 seed
Magmas obeying Definition 2.32 also obey Definition 2.39, Definition 2.15, Definition 2.11, Definition 2.8, Definition 2.10, Definition 2.9, Definition 2.18, and Definition 2.46, and are in fact abelian groups of exponent two. Conversely, all abelian groups of exponent two obey Definition 2.32.
For finite magmas, Equation 1681,
implies Equation 3877,
and Equation 1701,
implies Equation 1035,
Let
(i) 255 holds for
, that is to say .(ii) The equation
has the unique solution .(iii) The equation
has a solution.(iv) The equation
has a solution.(v) The equation
has a solution.(vi) The equation
has a solution.(vii) The equation
has a solution.
On a finite magma
Definition 2.43 implies Definition 2.42 and Definition 2.25.
Definition 2.52 has no non-trivial finite models.
Suppose that
Suppose that
For
(i)
.(ii)
.(iii)
for some .(iv)
for some .(v)
.(vi)
.(vii)
for some .(viii)
.
For
(i)
.(ii)
.(iii) For all
, implies .(iv)
.
Let
(i)
for some .(ii)
for some with .(iii)
for some with and .(iv)
for some with .(v)
for some , with either , , or for some .
There exists a magma which satisfies Equation 3342,
but such that none of the laws
hold.
The relation
We write
as the transitive closure of . as the reflexive transitive closure of . as the reflexive transitive and symmetric closure of .
We sometimes write
We say that
We say that
We say that
We say that (an arbitrary)
We say that
is Church-Rosser iff it is confluent.(Newman’s lemma) if
is strongly normalizing, then is confluent iff it is locally confluent.
Given a rewrite system
Given a rewrite system
If
If
Let
but
then the law
There exists a magma obeying the Asterix law (Definition 2.22) with carrier
Any finite magma obeying the Asterix law (Definition 2.22) also is left-cancellative and obeys the Obelix law (Definition 2.31).
One can assign
(i) For all
and , and .(ii) For all
, the map is injective.
There exists a way to extend
One can find maps
Let
(i) We have
for
.(ii) We have
and
for
, , and .(iii) If
are distinct and for some and , then .
Then Equation 2, Equation 3 and hence Equation 1 holds.
Let
Let
[Compatibility between magma laws over finite sets and the natural numbers] Let
Let
Let
If
Given a theory
if
, then . for any word .if
, then .if
and , then .if
, then for every .if
and , then .
An equational law of the form
where
where
Every partial solution
Suppose one has a partial solution in which
(A) If
for some , then is defined.(B) If
for some , then is defined.(C) If
for some , and is defined, then is defined.
Then one can extend the partial solution so that
Suppose we can find a function
Let
All finite magmas which satisfy Definition 2.44 also satisfy Definition 2.41.
Suppose we have a partial solution for which
Let
The free magma
For
(i)
.(ii)
and .(iii)
, , and .(iv)
, and there exists such that and .(v)
, and one of the claims , , or holds.
Here we adopt the convention that a claim can only hold if all terms in it are well-defined, for instance claim (ii) can only hold if
Let
- (i)
obeys the theory : .- (ii)
For any magma
obeying the theory and any function , there exists a unique magma homomorphism such that .
Let
If
Every partial solution can be extended to a complete solution that obeys Equation 2 and Equation 3, and hence 1323.
A law
Two laws are said to be equivalent if they imply each other.
Given a function
Let
If
is a product , then takes the formfor some
, , some , and some words such that for all , is of the formfor some
withIn particular,
.Similarly, if
is a generator, then takes the formfor some
, and some words such that for all , is of the formfor some
withIn particular,
.
Conversely, any word of the above forms is equivalent to
Let
Suppose we have a bijection
for all
Up to relabeling, the number of laws
Up to relabeling and symmetry, the number of laws
when
when
Up to relabeling, symmetry, and triviality, the number of laws of total order
if
if
Suppose that we have a magma with carrier
for some endomorphisms
Suppose we have a finite magma
Let
(i) For all
, we have .(ii) For all
, the elements are distinct from each other and from as varies.(iii) If
for some and some , then .(iv) For all
, we have .
Suppose also that we have an operation
(v) For all
, we have .(vi) For all
and , we have .(vii) For all
with not already covered by rules (v) or (vi), we have for some . Furthermore, .
Then one can endow
If
, then .If
and , then .If
and , then .If
, then .
Furthermore, the 817 law
Take
If
Definition 2.53 characterizes natural central groupoids.
There exists a magma which satisfies Definition 2.33 and not Definition 2.24.
There exists a magma which satisfies Definition 2.35 and not Definition 2.45.
There exists a magma which satisfies Definition 2.44 and not Definition 2.41.
Let
or
In particular,
A partial solution
A partially defined function
, defined on a finite union of right cosets of ;A partially defined operation
, defined on a finite set;A partially defined function
, defined on a finite set; andA finite collection
of “pending identities” , which one can think of either as ordered triples of elements , or as formal strings of the form “ ” for some .
Furthermore, the following axioms are satisfied:
(i”)
is defined and equal to , then we have the identities Equation 6, Equation 7 for all .(S) If
is defined for some , then is defined for all .(iii”) If
for some and some , and are defined, then is defined and equal to .(iv”) If
is such that is defined, then is defined and equal to .(v”) If
and is defined, then is defined and equal to .(vi”) For all
and , if is defined, then is defined and equal to .(vii”) For all
and is not equal to or for any , and is defined, then it is equal to some . Furthermore, either is a pending identity, or else and are defined and equal to each other.(P) If
is a pending identity, then , and and are undefined. Furthermore, is not equal to or for any , and is not of the form or for any , where is the parent of .(P’) If
and are pending identities, then .(P”) If
is a pending identity, then .(L) If
is the parent of with , and is defined, then it is not equal to .
We say that one partial solution
A partial solution is a finite family
Let
for all
A partial solution
together with a function
- (a)
If
, then , so that is well-defined as an element of ; furthermore, lies in , so that the left-hand side of Equation 1 makes sense; and Equation 1 holds.- (b)
The function
is a bijection from to .
We partially order the space of partial solutions to Equation 1 by writing
for . agrees with on .
When this occurs we say that the partial solution
We define the empty partial solution
A partial solution for an Obelix is a partial function
has finite domain. is injective. maps the identity (of , so, 0) to the identity.If
is in the domain of , and is in the domain, then so is .If
is in the domain of , and is in the domain, then . This is well-defined by property (4).The function
, which is defined on the same domain as , is injective.If
is in the domain of but isn’t in the domain, then isn’t in the domain or image of .
If we define
Let
Suppose we have a partial solution, and let
Definition Definition 2.55 axiomatizes the Sheffer stroke operation