Weak PFR over the integers #
Here we use the entropic form of PFR to deduce a weak form of PFR over the integers.
Main statement #
weak_PFR_int
: Let and . There exists such that and .
The property of two sets A, B of a group G not being contained in cosets of the same proper subgroup
Equations
- NotInCoset A B = (AddSubgroup.closure (A - A ∪ (B - B)) = ⊤)
Instances For
Without loss of generality, one can move (up to translation and embedding) any pair A, B of non-empty sets into a subgroup where they are not in a coset.
If G
is torsion-free and X, Y
are G
-valued random variables then d[X ; 2Y] ≤ 5d[X ; Y]
.
If G
is a torsion-free group and X, Y
are G
-valued random variables and
φ : G → 𝔽₂^d
is a homomorphism then H[φ ∘ X ; μ] ≤ 10 * d[X ; μ # Y ; μ']
.
Let X, Y
be G
-valued random variables such that
[\mathbb{H}(X)+\mathbb{H}(Y)> (20/\alpha) d[X ;Y],]
for some
If X, Y
are G
-valued random variables and
If X, Y
are G
-valued random variables then there is
a subgroup
Let
A version of the third isomorphism theorem: if G₂ ≤ G and H' is a subgroup of G⧸G₂, then there is a canonical isomorphism between H⧸H' and G⧸N, where N is the preimage of H' in G. A bit clunky; may be a better way to do this
Given two non-empty finite subsets A, B of a rank n free Z-module G, there exists a subgroup N
and points x, y in G/N such that the fibers Ax, By of A, B over x, y respectively are non-empty,
one has the inequality
Separating out the conclusion of weak_PFR_asymm
for convenience of induction arguments.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
The property of two sets A,B of a group G not being contained in cosets of the same proper subgroup
Equations
- not_in_coset A B = (AddSubgroup.closure (A - A ∪ (B - B)) = ⊤)
Instances For
In fact one has equality here, but this is trickier to prove and not needed for the argument.
If
If
Let