Analytic Number Theory Exponent Database

6 Growth exponents for the Riemann zeta function

Definition 6.1 Growth rate of zeta
#

For any fixed σR, let μ(σ) denote the least possible (fixed) exponent for which one has the bound

|ζ(σ+it)||t|μ(σ)+o(1)

for all unbounded t.

One can check that for each σ, the set of possible candidates for μ(σ) is closed (by underspill), non-empty, and bounded from below, so that μ(σ) is well-defined as a real number. An equivalent definition without asymptotic notation, is that μ(σ) is the least real number such that for every ε>0 there exists C>0 such that

|ζ(σ+it)|C|t|μ(σ)+ε

for all t with |t|C; equivalently, one has

μ(σ)=lim sup|t|log|ζ(σ+it)|log|t|.

Implemented at bound_mu.py as:
Bound_mu

Lemma 6.2 Trivial bound

One has μ(σ)=0 for all σ1.

Implemented at bound_mu.py as:
apply_trivial_mu_bound()

Proof
Lemma 6.3 Convexity

μ is convex.

Implemented at bound_mu.py as:
bound_mu_convexity()

Proof
Lemma 6.4 Functional equation

One has μ(1σ)=μ(σ)+σ1/2 for all 0σ1/2.

Implemented at bound_mu.py as:
apply_functional_equation()

Proof
Lemma 6.5 Left of critical strip

One has μ(σ)=1/2σ for σ0.

Implemented at bound_mu.py as:
apply_trivial_mu_bound()

Proof
Lemma 6.6 Convexity bounds

One has max(0,1/2σ)μ(σ)(1σ)/2 for 0σ1.

Implemented at bound_mu.py as:
apply_trivial_mu_bound()

Proof

6.1 Connection with exponent pairs and dual exponent pairs

Lemma 6.7 Connection with dual exponent pairs

For any 1/2σ1, one has

μ(σ)sup0α1/2β(α)ασ.
Proof

We remark that this inequality is morally an equality (indeed, it would be if one would restrict the model phases in Definition 4.2 to purely the logarithmic phase ulogu).

The following form of Lemma 6.7 is convenient for applications:

Corollary 6.8 Exponent pairs and μ

If (k,) is an exponent pair, then

μ(k)k.

Implemented at bound_mu.py as:
exponent_pair_to_mu_bound(exp_pair)

Proof
Heuristic 6.9 Lindelöf hypothesis

One has μ(1/2)=0.

Implemented at bound_mu.py as:
bound_mu_Lindelof()

The exponent pair conjecture implies the Lindelöf hypothesis.

Proof
Proposition 6.11 Conjectured value of μ

We have the lower bound

μ(σ)max(0,12σ)
1

for all σR, and equality holds everywhere in 1 if and only if the Lindelöf hypothesis holds.

We remark that this proposition explains why there are no further lower bounds on μ in the literature beyond 1; all the remaining known results revolve around upper bounds.

Proof

6.2 Known bounds on μ

Theorem 6.12 Historical bounds

The upper bounds on μ(σ) given by Table 6.1 are known.

TODO: supplement as many of these citations as possible with derivations from other exponents and relations in the database

Table 6.1 Historical bounds on μ(σ) for 1/2σ1, and the exponent pair generating them (if applicable).

Reference

Results

Exponent pair

Hardy–Littlewood (1923) [ 50 ]

μ(1/2)1/6

(1/6, 2/3)

Walfisz (1924) [ 149 ]

μ(1/2)193/988

 

Titchmarsh (1932) [ 165 ]

μ(1/2)27/164

 

Phillips (1933) [ 138 ]

μ(1/2)229/1392

 

Titchmarsh (1942) [ 167 ]

μ(1/2)19/116

 

Min (1949) [ 128 ]

μ(1/2)15/92

 

Haneke (1962) [ 46 ]

μ(1/2)6/37

 

Kolesnik (1973) [ 109 ]

μ(1/2)173/1067

 

Kolesnik (1982) [ 106 ]

μ(1/2)35/216

 

Kolesnik (1985) [ 107 ]

μ(1/2)139/858

 

Bombieri–Iwaniec (1985) [ 10 ]

μ(1/2)9/56

(9/56,1/2+9/56)

Watt (1989) [ 173 ]

μ(1/2)89/560

(89/560,1/2+89/560)

Huxley–Kolesnik (1991) [ 74 ]

μ(1/2)17/108

(17/108,1/2+17/108)

Huxley (1993) [ 70 ]

μ(1/2)89/570

(89/570,1/2+89/570)

Huxley (1996) [ 71 ]

μ(1934/3655)6299/43860

 

Sargos (2003) [ 157 ]

μ(49/51)1/204, μ(361/370)1/370

 

Huxley (2005) [ 73 ]

μ(1/2)32/205

(32/205,1/2+32/205)

Lelechenko (2014) [ 112 ]

μ(3/5)1409/12170, μ(4/5)3/71

 

Bourgain (2017) [ 14 ]

μ(1/2)13/84

(13/84,1/2+13/84)

Heath-Brown (2017) [ 63 ]

μ(σ)86315(1σ)3/2 for 1/2σ1

 

Heath-Brown (2020) [ 34 ]

μ(11/15)1/15

 

Recorded in literature.py as:
add_literature_bounds_mu()

Some additional bounds are recorded in [ 169 ] by combining various exponential sum estimates.

Theorem 6.13

[ 169 , Theorems 2.4-2.6 ] We have

μ(σ){(3136σ)/84,12σ<88225153852=0.5734,(220633251324σ)/620612,88225153852σ<521796=0.6545,(13331508σ)/3825,521796σ<5314176066=0.6986,(405454σ)/1202,5314176066σ<36205119=0.7071,(4931885552938216σ)/170145110,36205119σ<5220969128=0.7552,(471957502648σ)/1682490,5220969128σ<13891736=0.8001,(28413016σ)/10316,13891736σ<134765163248=0.8255,(859908σ)/3214,134765163248σ<1819321906=0.8305,5(87079067σ)/180277,1819321906σ<249280=0.8892,(2930σ)/130,249280σ910.

Furthermore, for 1/2σ1, we have

μ(σ)21310(1σ)3/2=0.4865(1σ)3/2,

and

μ(σ)233/2(1σ)3/2+103300(1σ)2,117955118272σ1.

Recorded in literature.py as:
add_literature_bounds_mu()

Additionally, the series of exponent pairs in Theorem 5.17 imply the following bounds on μ(σ) close to σ=1.

Theorem 6.14 Heath-Brown [ 63 ] μ bounds

For any integer k3, one has

μ(13k23k+2k(k1)2(k+2))2(k1)2(k+2).
Proof

The new exponent pairs in Theorem 5.22 may be used to obtain sharper bounds on μ(σ) in certain ranges. The current sharpest bounds on μ(σ) are recorded in Table 6.2 and graphed in Figure 6.1.

Table 6.2 Current sharpest known bound on μ(σ) for 1/2σ1

Upper bound on μ(σ)

Range of σ

Reference

μ(σ)318437σ

12σ88225153852=0.5734

Theorem 6.13

μ(σ)22063362061262831155153σ

88225153852σ521796=0.6545

Theorem 6.13

μ(σ)1333382515083825σ

521796σ5314176066=0.6986

Theorem 6.13

μ(σ)4051202227601σ

5314176066σ454641=0.7082

Theorem 6.13

μ(σ)77925904231295σ

454641σ34736924856993=0.7151

Theorem 5.22, Corollary 6.8

μ(σ)161059356224108619962811205σ

34736924856993σ5220969128=0.7552

Theorem 5.22, Corollary 6.8

μ(σ)157319560830251324841245σ

5220969128σ13891736=0.8001

Theorem 5.22, Corollary 6.8

μ(σ)2841103167542579σ

13891736σ587779702192=0.8370

Theorem 6.13

μ(σ)169165548903277σ

587779702192σ74418695=0.8557

Theorem 5.22, Corollary 6.8

μ(σ)29130313σ

74418695σ277300=0.9233

Theorem 5.22, Theorem 6.14

μ(σ)λμn+(1λ)μn+1

μn=2(n1)2(n+2)

λ=(σn+1σ)/(σn+1σn)

σnσσn+1

σn=13n23n+2n(n1)2(n+2),(n7)

Theorem 6.14

Derived in derived.py as:
compute_best_mu_bound()

\includegraphics[width=0.5\linewidth ]{chapter/mu_bound_plot.png}
Figure 6.1 Current sharpest known bound on μ(σ) for 1/2σ1.

6.3 Connection to the Riemann hypothesis

It is well known that the Riemann hypothesis implies the Lindelöf hypothesis. Here is a sharper version, essentially due to Backlund [ 2 ] :

Lemma 6.15 Growth exponent and zeroes

Let 1/2σ0<1 be fixed. Then the assertion μ(σ0)=0 is equivalent to the assertion that for any fixed ε>0 and unbounded T>0, the number of zeroes σ+it of the zeta function with σσ0+ε and TtT+1 is o(logT).

Proof